Choose the collaboration model that matches your current stage, from quick integration to deep customization.
Self-serve integration for a fast start
$ 0
Start with Free to validate your scenario, then upgrade support when needed.
More stable support on top of self-serve usage
$ 78
If your project is in delivery stage, Sponsor usually improves collaboration efficiency.
Project-based collaboration for complex business needs
$ Negotiable
Share your project context and we can provide an initial evaluation path.
Compare on the same dimensions to pick the best plan for your current stage.
| Item | Free | Sponsor Plan | Custom Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability Scope | Basic capabilities available | Basic capabilities + usage support | Customized by business goals |
| Deliverables | Documentation and examples | Documentation + one-on-one Q&A | Source code + documentation + integration |
| Support Model | Community communication | Dedicated Q&A during support period | Project-based continuous collaboration |
| Launch Assurance | Self-managed | Issue consultation support | Integration and launch support |
| Pricing | Free | Fixed sponsor price | Quoted after evaluation |
A structured process keeps communication predictable, delivery transparent, and launch risk manageable.
Clarify business goals, key scenarios, and priorities.
Estimate complexity, timeline, technical boundaries, and feasible approaches.
Confirm interaction details, visual rules, and API contracts.
Deliver iteratively with integration checkpoints and risk sync.
Ship against acceptance criteria, then support launch and retrospective improvements.
Different plans have different delivery depth, but each provides practical engineering outputs.
Execution-focused response standards to keep communication efficient and issues closed.
Aligning boundaries early reduces communication overhead and rework.
These are the most common questions during early discussions.
Usually by complexity, timeline, and collaboration model; custom projects are quoted after evaluation.
Yes. Milestone-based delivery is recommended, starting with high-priority core capabilities.
Yes. Deliverables are kept modular to support future extension work.
Ownership terms can be clearly defined before implementation based on project type.
Common scenarios and representative outcomes from real projects.
Reworked chart layout, theme, and interaction density for active trading desks.
Core operation paths became shorter and onboarding cost dropped.
Added strategy annotation, replay analysis, and multi-indicator linkage.
Research throughput improved with a more standardized review flow.
Integrated market data, trading, risk control, and permission systems into one chart layer.
Frontend module reuse increased and maintenance overhead decreased.
If your project is in planning or development, share your context first and we will suggest a practical path.